Re: [PATCH v6 05/13] PCI: brcmstb: Use bridge reset if available

[Krzysztof Wilczyński]

Hello,

[...]
> > > > >  static void brcm_pcie_bridge_sw_init_set_generic(struct brcm_pcie *pcie, u32 val)
> > > > >  {
> > > > > -     u32 tmp, mask =  RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_GENERIC_MASK;
> > > > > -     u32 shift = RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_GENERIC_SHIFT;
> > > > > +     if (val)
> > > > > +             reset_control_assert(pcie->bridge_reset);
> > > > > +     else
> > > > > +             reset_control_deassert(pcie->bridge_reset);
> > > > >
> > > > > -     tmp = readl(pcie->base + PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1(pcie));
> > > > > -     tmp = (tmp & ~mask) | ((val << shift) & mask);
> > > > > -     writel(tmp, pcie->base + PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1(pcie));
> > > > > +     if (!pcie->bridge_reset) {
> > > > > +             u32 tmp, mask =  RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_GENERIC_MASK;
> > > > > +             u32 shift = RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_GENERIC_SHIFT;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +             tmp = readl(pcie->base + PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1(pcie));
> > > > > +             tmp = (tmp & ~mask) | ((val << shift) & mask);
> > > > > +             writel(tmp, pcie->base + PCIE_RGR1_SW_INIT_1(pcie));
> > > > > +     }
> > > >
> > > > This pattern looks goofy:
> > > >
> > > >   reset_control_assert(pcie->bridge_reset);
> > > >   if (!pcie->bridge_reset) {
> > > >     ...
> > > >
> > > > If we're going to test pcie->bridge_reset at all, it should be first
> > > > so it's obvious what's going on and the reader doesn't have to go
> > > > verify that reset_control_assert() ignores and returns success for a
> > > > NULL pointer:
> > > >
> > > >   if (pcie->bridge_reset) {
> > > >     if (val)
> > > >       reset_control_assert(pcie->bridge_reset);
> > > >     else
> > > >       reset_control_deassert(pcie->bridge_reset);
> > > >
> > > >     return;
> > > >   }
> > > >
> > > >   u32 tmp, mask =  RGR1_SW_INIT_1_INIT_GENERIC_MASK;
> > > >   ...
> > > >
> > > Will do.
> > [...]
> > 
> > You will do what?  If you don't mind me asking.
> 
> Can you just do the rework on the branch, Krzysztof?  I think that
> will be easier/quicker than having Jim repost the entire series.

Will do. That was the idea, I believe.

	Krzysztof