Re: [PATCH 00/19] Add initial support for QCS8300

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 04/09/2024 10:33, Jingyi Wang wrote:
> Add initial support for QCS8300 SoC and QCS8300 RIDE board.
> 
> This revision brings support for:
> - CPUs with cpu idle
> - interrupt-controller with PDC wakeup support
> - gcc
> - TLMM
> - interconnect
> - qup with uart
> - smmu
> - pmic
> - ufs
> - ipcc
> - sram
> - remoteprocs including ADSP,CDSP and GPDSP
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> patch series organized as:
> - 1-2: remoteproc binding and driver
> - 3-5: ufs binding and driver
> - 6-7: rpmhpd binding and driver
> - 8-15: bindings for other components found on the SoC

Limit your CC list. I found like 8 unnecessary addresses for already
huge Cc list. Or organize your patches per subsystem, as we usually expect.

> - 16-19: changes to support the device tree
> 
> dependencies:
> tlmm: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240819064933.1778204-1-quic_jingyw@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> gcc: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240820-qcs8300-gcc-v1-0-d81720517a82@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> interconnect: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240827151622.305-1-quic_rlaggysh@xxxxxxxxxxx/

Why? UFS cannot depend on pinctrl for example.

This blocks testing and merging.

Please organize properly (so decouple) your patches, so that there is no
fake dependency.

Best regards,
Krzysztof