Re: [PATCH RFC PREVIEW 6/6] iommu/vt-d: do not require a PASID in page requests

[Joel Granados]

On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 01:40:32PM +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> PRQ events can now be handled without a PASID being present. Remove the
> restriction.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/intel/prq.c | 12 +++---------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/prq.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/prq.c
> index 2814373e95d8..cc36198ebf91 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/prq.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/prq.c
> @@ -101,18 +101,12 @@ static irqreturn_t prq_event_thread(int irq, void *d)
>  		req = &iommu->prq[head / sizeof(*req)];
>  		address = (u64)req->addr << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT;
>  
> -		if (unlikely(!req->pasid_present)) {
> -			pr_err("IOMMU: %s: Page request without PASID\n",
> -			       iommu->name);
> -bad_req:
> -			handle_bad_prq_event(iommu, req, QI_RESP_INVALID);
> -			goto prq_advance;
> -		}
> -
>  		if (unlikely(!is_canonical_address(address))) {
>  			pr_err("IOMMU: %s: Address is not canonical\n",
>  			       iommu->name);
> -			goto bad_req;
> +bad_req:
> +			handle_bad_prq_event(iommu, req, QI_RESP_INVALID);
> +			goto prq_advance;
>  		}
>  
>  		if (unlikely(req->pm_req && (req->rd_req | req->wr_req))) {
> 
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 

I'll squash this commit with the one that introduces the prq.c file.

Best

-- 

Joel Granados