Re: [PATCH v2 07/14] mm: khugepaged: collapse_pte_mapped_thp() use pte_offset_map_rw_nolock()

From: Qi Zheng
Date: Thu Sep 05 2024 - 02:42:12 EST




On 2024/9/5 14:32, Muchun Song wrote:


On Aug 30, 2024, at 14:54, Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On 2024/8/29 16:10, Muchun Song wrote:
On 2024/8/22 15:13, Qi Zheng wrote:
In collapse_pte_mapped_thp(), we may modify the pte and pmd entry after
acquring the ptl, so convert it to using pte_offset_map_rw_nolock(). At
this time, the write lock of mmap_lock is not held, and the pte_same()
check is not performed after the PTL held. So we should get pgt_pmd and do
pmd_same() check after the ptl held.

For the case where the ptl is released first and then the pml is acquired,
the PTE page may have been freed, so we must do pmd_same() check before
reacquiring the ptl.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/khugepaged.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 53bfa7f4b7f82..15d3f7f3c65f2 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -1604,7 +1604,7 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
if (userfaultfd_armed(vma) && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED))
pml = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
- start_pte = pte_offset_map_nolock(mm, pmd, haddr, &ptl);
+ start_pte = pte_offset_map_rw_nolock(mm, pmd, haddr, &pgt_pmd, &ptl);
if (!start_pte) /* mmap_lock + page lock should prevent this */
goto abort;
if (!pml)
@@ -1612,6 +1612,9 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
else if (ptl != pml)
spin_lock_nested(ptl, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+ if (unlikely(!pmd_same(pgt_pmd, pmdp_get_lockless(pmd))))
+ goto abort;
+
/* step 2: clear page table and adjust rmap */
for (i = 0, addr = haddr, pte = start_pte;
i < HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, pte++) {
@@ -1657,6 +1660,16 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
/* step 4: remove empty page table */
if (!pml) {
pml = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
+ /*
+ * We called pte_unmap() and release the ptl before acquiring
+ * the pml, which means we left the RCU critical section, so the
+ * PTE page may have been freed, so we must do pmd_same() check
+ * before reacquiring the ptl.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!pmd_same(pgt_pmd, pmdp_get_lockless(pmd)))) {
+ spin_unlock(pml);
+ goto pmd_change;
Seems we forget to flush TLB since we've cleared some pte entry?

See comment above the ptep_clear():

/*
* Must clear entry, or a racing truncate may re-remove it.
* TLB flush can be left until pmdp_collapse_flush() does it.
* PTE dirty? Shmem page is already dirty; file is read-only.
*/

The TLB flush was handed over to pmdp_collapse_flush(). If a

But you skipped pmdp_collapse_flush().

I skip it only in !pmd_same() case, at which time it must be cleared
by other thread, which will be responsible for flushing TLB:

CPU 0 CPU 1
pmd_clear
spin_unlock
flushing tlb
spin_lock
if (!pmd_same)
goto pmd_change;
pmdp_collapse_flush

Did I miss something?


concurrent thread free the PTE page at this time, the TLB will
also be flushed after pmd_clear().

+ }
if (ptl != pml)
spin_lock_nested(ptl, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
}
@@ -1688,6 +1701,7 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
pte_unmap_unlock(start_pte, ptl);
if (pml && pml != ptl)
spin_unlock(pml);
+pmd_change:
if (notified)
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
drop_folio: