Re: [PATCH] amba: make amba_bustype constant

[Kunwu Chan]

Thanks for the reply.
On 2024/9/4 21:58, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 09:31:29AM +0800, Kunwu Chan wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply.
> > On 2024/8/28 21:17, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 10:51:54AM +0800, Kunwu Chan wrote:
> > > > On 2024/8/27 21:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 03:45:31PM +0800, Kunwu Chan wrote:
> > > > > > On 2024/8/26 18:40, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 06:08:11PM +0800, Kunwu Chan wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > > > > Make it patch series:
> > > > > > > 1) patch that introduces exported function called dev_is_amba() (1 patch)
> > > > Done.
> > > > > > > 2) convert user-by-user (N patches)
> > > > I've no idea about how to modify, such as in iommu.c:
> > > Oh, crap. Yes, this need more thinking.
> > > Anyway, Russell is okay with your initial patch, the rest can be done
> > > separately. For now probably we can leave it exported for this only case.
> > Anyway, thanks for the suggestion, i'll   introduce the dev_is_amba function
> >
> > and  add the Suggested tag for you.
> >
> > If you have a better idea and need me to do it, you can always contact me.
> General policy is not to add stuff that doesn't have any users. From
> what I can see from briefly reading this discussion, and looking at
> the patches submitted to me, the dev_is_amba() patch adds a helper,
> but as yet there are no users - and not even any patches on a mailing
> list to make use of this helper. Therefore, I won't be applying that
> patch.

Actually, here is a user in [1], i'am ready to use it  in [2].

 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_AMBA
 	else if (dev->bus == &amba_bustype)

[1] 
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10.8/source/drivers/of/platform.c#L631

[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240828150826.GA3803566-robh@xxxxxxxxxx/

> Good idea, but it needs users...
>
> Please note that I likely won't be reading further discussion (see
> my signature below, and I'm having the same op on the other eye -
> which is the only eye suitable for screen work at the moment -
> this Friday.)

Sure, i've send it to the armlinux.org.uk as:

https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=9415/1

https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=9416/1


Good health.

--
Thanks,
  Kunwu.Chan