Re: [PATCH v3 04/29] media: iris: initialize power resources

[Vikash Garodia]

Hi,

On 9/6/2024 5:34 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/09/2024 13:21, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +	}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>  	ret = v4l2_device_register(dev, &core->v4l2_dev);
>>>>>>  	if (ret)
>>>>>>  		return ret;
>>>>>> @@ -88,8 +101,14 @@ static int iris_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  static const struct of_device_id iris_dt_match[] = {
>>>>>> -	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8550-iris", },
>>>>>> -	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-venus", },
>>>>>> +	{
>>>>>> +		.compatible = "qcom,sm8550-iris",
>>>>>> +		.data = &sm8550_data,
>>>>>> +	},
>>>>>> +	{
>>>>>> +		.compatible = "qcom,sm8250-venus",
>>>>>> +		.data = &sm8250_data,
>>>>>
>>>>> You just added this. No, please do not add code which is immediatly
>>>>> incorrect.
>>>> It's not incorrect, in earlier patch we only added the compatible strings
>>>> and with this patch introducing the platform data and APIs to get it.
>>>
>>> It is incorrect to immediately remove it. You keep arguing on basic
>>> stuff. Sorry, but that is not how it works. If you add code and
>>> IMMEDIATELY remove it, then it means the code was not needed. Or was not
>>> correct. Choose one.
>> I think it is not removing it. It is adding platform data to compatibles
>> introduced in previous patch. Maybe it appears as if it is removing it.
> 
> I know how the diff works.
Perhaps, i have misunderstood. Are you suggesting to add compat data and
compatible string together in single patch rather than splitting it in 2 patches
? If so, that would essentially end up squashing patch #3 and #4. Let me know if
that would address your comment and we will plan to do that.

> The way you avoid solving the problem with trivial responses is not
> helping. We already have been there with another patchset from different
> person and it lead to annoying all DT maintainers and (usually very
> patient) some of networking folks. I ask you to approach to the review
> seriously.
Please be assured that all comments are valued upon and are being taken seriously.

> NAK.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
Regards,
Vikash