Re: [syzbot] [syzbot] [ocfs2?] general protection fault in ocfs2_buffer_cached

From: syzbot
Date: Fri Sep 06 2024 - 17:25:38 EST

Next message: Roman Kisel: "Re: [PATCH 1/1] ptrace: Get tracer PID without reliance on the proc FS"
Previous message: Randy Dunlap: "Re: [PATCH] docs:mm: fixed spelling and grammar mistakes on vmalloc kernel stack page"
In reply to: syzbot: "Re: [syzbot] [syzbot] [ocfs2?] general protection fault in ocfs2_buffer_cached"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

***

Subject: [syzbot] [ocfs2?] general protection fault in ocfs2_buffer_cached
Author: ghanshyam1898@xxxxxxxxx

bug fix in some cases when bh is null

#syz test

Next message: Roman Kisel: "Re: [PATCH 1/1] ptrace: Get tracer PID without reliance on the proc FS"
Previous message: Randy Dunlap: "Re: [PATCH] docs:mm: fixed spelling and grammar mistakes on vmalloc kernel stack page"
In reply to: syzbot: "Re: [syzbot] [syzbot] [ocfs2?] general protection fault in ocfs2_buffer_cached"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]