Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] i2c: i2c-qcom-geni: Enable i2c controller sharing between two subsystems

[Andi Shyti]

Hi Mukesh,

On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 12:44:38AM GMT, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
> Add support to share I2C SE by two Subsystems in a mutually exclusive way.
> Use  "qcom,shared-se" flag in a particular i2c instance node if the
> usecase requires i2c controller to be shared.
> 
> I2C driver just need to mark first_msg and last_msg flag to help indicate
> GPI driver to  take lock and unlock TRE there by protecting from concurrent
> access from other EE or Subsystem.
> 
> gpi_create_i2c_tre() function at gpi.c will take care of adding Lock and
> Unlock TRE for the respective transfer operations.
> 
> Since the GPIOs are also shared for the i2c bus between two SS, do not
> touch GPIO configuration during runtime suspend and only turn off the
> clocks. This will allow other SS to continue to transfer the data
> without any disturbance over the IO lines.

if I remember correctly, someone already commented on your
patches to explain and expand the achronyms you are using. Please
improve the commit log so that people who don't know this device
can understand.

...

> @@ -631,8 +636,11 @@ static int geni_i2c_gpi_xfer(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg msgs[], i
>  		dma_async_issue_pending(gi2c->tx_c);
>  
>  		time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&gi2c->done, XFER_TIMEOUT);
> -		if (!time_left)
> +		if (!time_left) {
> +			dev_err(gi2c->se.dev, "I2C timeout gpi flags:%d addr:0x%x\n",
> +						gi2c->cur->flags, gi2c->cur->addr);

Please, don't print out here. The user doesn't really need to
know, let the upper levels decide what to do.

>  			gi2c->err = -ETIMEDOUT;
> +		}
>  
>  		if (gi2c->err) {
>  			ret = gi2c->err;
> @@ -800,6 +808,11 @@ static int geni_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		gi2c->clk_freq_out = KHZ(100);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,shared-se")) {
> +		gi2c->is_shared = true;
> +		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Shared SE Usecase\n");

Please, improve this debug message.

The rest looks good to me.

Thanks,
Andi