Re: [GIT PULL] nolibc for 6.12-rc1

[Shuah Khan]

On 9/8/24 04:22, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 05:57:52PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > On 9/5/24 10:35, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 05:57:22PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > > On 2024-09-05 08:32:14+0000, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 08:22:18AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > > > > > ./run-tests.sh -p -m user
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > These toolchains can then also be used for direct "make" invocations
> > > > > > > through CROSS_COMPILE.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I really suspect an empty CC variable somewhere that could explain why
> > > > > > only CROSS_COMPILE is used. I'll try to find time today to give it a
> > > > > > try here as well, just in case I can reproduce the same issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > In fact I'm getting it without any options:
> > > > >
> > > > >     $ ./run-tests.sh
> > > > >     realpath: /home/willy/.cache/crosstools/gcc-13.2.0-nolibc/i386-linux/bin/i386-linux-: No such file or directory
> > > > >
> > > > > It comes from here in test_arch():
> > > > >
> > > > >           cross_compile=$(realpath "${download_location}gcc-${crosstool_version}-nolibc/${ct_arch}-${ct_abi}/bin/${ct_arch}-${ct_abi}-")
> > > > >
> > > > > Thus it's indeed related to the absence of the toolchain there. It's
> > > > > just that the way the error is reported (due to set -e) is a bit harsh.
> > > >
> > > > Ack. It should not occur with "-p" though.
> > >
> > > Agreed, I was focusing on first experience for users essentially.
> > >
> > > > > What about this ?
> > > > >
> > > > >     $ ./run-tests.sh
> > > > >     No toolchain found in /home/willy/.cache/crosstools/gcc-13.2.0-nolibc/i386-linux.
> > > > >     Did you install the toolchains or set the correct arch ? Rerun with -h for help.
> > > > >     Aborting...
> > > > >
> > > > > or anything similar, achieved by this patch (warning copy-paste, mangled
> > > > > indents):
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run-tests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run-tests.sh
> > > > > index e7ecda4ae796..0f67e80051dc 100755
> > > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run-tests.sh
> > > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run-tests.sh
> > > > > @@ -143,6 +143,13 @@ test_arch() {
> > > > >           arch=$1
> > > > >           ct_arch=$(crosstool_arch "$arch")
> > > > >           ct_abi=$(crosstool_abi "$1")
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       if [ ! -d "${download_location}gcc-${crosstool_version}-nolibc/${ct_arch}-${ct_abi}/bin/." ]; then
> > > > > +               echo "No toolchain found in ${download_location}gcc-${crosstool_version}-nolibc/${ct_arch}-${ct_abi}."
> > > > > +               echo "Did you install the toolchains or set the correct arch ? Rerun with -h for help."
> > > > > +               return 1
> > > > > +       fi
> > > > > +
> > > > >           cross_compile=$(realpath "${download_location}gcc-${crosstool_version}-nolibc/${ct_arch}-${ct_abi}/bin/${ct_arch}-${ct_abi}-")
> > > > >           build_dir="${build_location}/${arch}"
> > > > >           if [ "$werror" -ne 0 ]; then
> > > >
> > > > Looks good.
> > >
> > > OK thanks, I'll try to handle it this week-end if I'm not beaten to
> > > it. If you or Shuah want to merge it before, feel free to, no offense
> > > on my side!
> >
> > Sounds good. My system is back to a good state with the tests after running
> > ./run-tests.sh -p -m user
> >
> > My guess is my setup was lost when I upgraded my system.
>
> Makes sense.
>
> FWIW I've just pushed the patch above to nolibc-next. Since it's not a
> result of a change of the last PR, there's no need to udpate it I think,
> it can easily wait for the next one (it's just a help message after all).

Sounds good. We can add this later too during the release cycle for one
of the rcs.

> During the tests I've also got caught with -d which needs a trailing slash
> otherwise doesn't concatenate directories correctly. I don't know if that's
> intentional or not so I didn't change it (and it's not important either).

It is good to fix this and give more information to users.

thanks,
-- Shuah