RE: [PATCH] EDAC/sb_edac: Fix typos

From: Zhuo, Qiuxu
Date: Tue Sep 10 2024 - 01:56:43 EST


> From: Andrew Kreimer <algonell@xxxxxxxxx>
> [...]
> Subject: [PATCH] EDAC/sb_edac: Fix typos
>
> Fix typos in comments.
>
> Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Kreimer <algonell@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c index
> d5f12219598a..d47f1240c738 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> @@ -1797,7 +1797,7 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const struct
> mem_ctl_info *mci)
> * Step 2) Get SAD range and SAD Interleave list
> * TAD registers contain the interleave wayness. However, it
> * seems simpler to just discover it indirectly, with the
> - * algorithm bellow.
> + * algorithm below.
> */
> prv = 0;
> for (n_sads = 0; n_sads < pvt->info.max_sad; n_sads++) { @@ -2055,7
> +2055,7 @@ static int get_memory_error_data(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
>
> /*
> * Step 0) Check if the address is at special memory ranges
> - * The check bellow is probably enough to fill all cases where
> + * The check below is probably enough to fill all cases where
> * the error is not inside a memory, except for the legacy
> * range (e. g. VGA addresses). It is unlikely, however, that the
> * memory controller would generate an error on that range.
> --
> 2.46.0

Reviewed-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!
-Qiuxu