Re: [PATCH] clk: actions: prevent overflow in owl_pll_recalc_rate

From: Manivannan Sadhasivam
Date: Tue Sep 10 2024 - 12:53:02 EST


On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 04:06:40PM +0300, Anastasia Belova wrote:
> In case of OWL S900 SoC clock driver there are cases
> where bfreq = 24000000, shift = 0. If value read from
> CMU_COREPLL or CMU_DDRPLL to val is big enough, an
> overflow may occur.
>
> Add explicit casting to prevent it.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Fixes: 2792c37e94c8 ("clk: actions: Add pll clock support")
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Anastasia Belova <abelova@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Currently, val is limited to 8 bits max on the supported SoCs. So there won't be
any overflow. But for the sake of correctness, I'm OK with this patch.

Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>

- Mani

> ---
> drivers/clk/actions/owl-pll.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/actions/owl-pll.c b/drivers/clk/actions/owl-pll.c
> index 155f313986b4..fa17567665ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/actions/owl-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/actions/owl-pll.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static unsigned long owl_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> val = val >> pll_hw->shift;
> val &= mul_mask(pll_hw);
>
> - return pll_hw->bfreq * val;
> + return (unsigned long)pll_hw->bfreq * val;
> }
>
> static int owl_pll_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
> --
> 2.30.2
>

--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்