Re: [syzbot] Re: [syzbot] [net?] possible deadlock in rtnl_lock (8)
From: syzbot
Date: Wed Sep 11 2024 - 04:54:48 EST
For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, syzkaller-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
***
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [net?] possible deadlock in rtnl_lock (8)
Author: alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 8/19/24 11:49 AM, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: 1fb918967b56 Merge tag 'for-6.11-rc3-tag' of git://git.ker..
> git tree: upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=129dd7d9980000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=804764788c03071f
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=51cf7cc5f9ffc1006ef2
> compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
> userspace arch: arm64
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
>
> Downloadable assets:
> disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/384ffdcca292/non_bootable_disk-1fb91896.raw.xz
> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7b8fac7b5b8b/vmlinux-1fb91896.xz
> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/676950a147e6/Image-1fb91896.gz.xz
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+51cf7cc5f9ffc1006ef2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 6.11.0-rc3-syzkaller-00066-g1fb918967b56 #0 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syz.0.5481/17612 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff8000880033a8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_lock+0x1c/0x28 net/core/rtnetlink.c:79
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff000010332b50 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: smc_setsockopt+0xd8/0xcec net/smc/af_smc.c:3064
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #2 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x134/0x840 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
> mutex_lock_nested+0x24/0x30 kernel/locking/mutex.c:804
> smc_switch_to_fallback+0x34/0x80c net/smc/af_smc.c:902
> smc_sendmsg+0xe4/0x8f8 net/smc/af_smc.c:2779
> sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
> __sock_sendmsg+0xc8/0x168 net/socket.c:745
> __sys_sendto+0x1a8/0x254 net/socket.c:2204
> __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2216 [inline]
> __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2212 [inline]
> __arm64_sys_sendto+0xc0/0x134 net/socket.c:2212
> __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:35 [inline]
> invoke_syscall+0x6c/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:49
> el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xac/0x230 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:132
> do_el0_svc+0x40/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:151
> el0_svc+0x50/0x180 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:712
> el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x12c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:730
> el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:598
>
> -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}:
> lock_sock_nested+0x38/0xe8 net/core/sock.c:3543
> lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
> sockopt_lock_sock net/core/sock.c:1061 [inline]
> sockopt_lock_sock+0x58/0x74 net/core/sock.c:1052
> do_ip_setsockopt+0xe0/0x2358 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1078
> ip_setsockopt+0x34/0x9c net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1417
> raw_setsockopt+0x7c/0x2e0 net/ipv4/raw.c:845
> sock_common_setsockopt+0x70/0xe0 net/core/sock.c:3735
> do_sock_setsockopt+0x17c/0x354 net/socket.c:2324
> __sys_setsockopt+0xdc/0x178 net/socket.c:2347
> __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2356 [inline]
> __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2353 [inline]
> __arm64_sys_setsockopt+0xa4/0x100 net/socket.c:2353
> __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:35 [inline]
> invoke_syscall+0x6c/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:49
> el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xac/0x230 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:132
> do_el0_svc+0x40/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:151
> el0_svc+0x50/0x180 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:712
> el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x12c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:730
> el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:598
>
> -> #0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868 [inline]
> __lock_acquire+0x2aa4/0x6340 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
> lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759 [inline]
> lock_acquire+0x48c/0x7a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5724
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x134/0x840 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
> mutex_lock_nested+0x24/0x30 kernel/locking/mutex.c:804
> rtnl_lock+0x1c/0x28 net/core/rtnetlink.c:79
> do_ipv6_setsockopt+0x1a04/0x3814 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:566
> ipv6_setsockopt+0xc8/0x140 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:993
> tcp_setsockopt+0x90/0xcc net/ipv4/tcp.c:3768
> sock_common_setsockopt+0x70/0xe0 net/core/sock.c:3735
> smc_setsockopt+0x150/0xcec net/smc/af_smc.c:3072
> do_sock_setsockopt+0x17c/0x354 net/socket.c:2324
> __sys_setsockopt+0xdc/0x178 net/socket.c:2347
> __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2356 [inline]
> __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2353 [inline]
> __arm64_sys_setsockopt+0xa4/0x100 net/socket.c:2353
> __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:35 [inline]
> invoke_syscall+0x6c/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:49
> el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xac/0x230 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:132
> do_el0_svc+0x40/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:151
> el0_svc+0x50/0x180 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:712
> el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x12c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:730
> el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:598
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Chain exists of:
> rtnl_mutex --> sk_lock-AF_INET --> &smc->clcsock_release_lock
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
> lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
> lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
> lock(rtnl_mutex);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 1 lock held by syz.0.5481/17612:
> #0: ffff000010332b50 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: smc_setsockopt+0xd8/0xcec net/smc/af_smc.c:3064
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 17612 Comm: syz.0.5481 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-syzkaller-00066-g1fb918967b56 #0
> Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> Call trace:
> dump_backtrace+0x9c/0x11c arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:317
> show_stack+0x18/0x24 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:324
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
> dump_stack_lvl+0xa4/0xf4 lib/dump_stack.c:119
> dump_stack+0x1c/0x28 lib/dump_stack.c:128
> print_circular_bug+0x420/0x6f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2059
> check_noncircular+0x2dc/0x364 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2186
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868 [inline]
> __lock_acquire+0x2aa4/0x6340 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
> lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759 [inline]
> lock_acquire+0x48c/0x7a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5724
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x134/0x840 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
> mutex_lock_nested+0x24/0x30 kernel/locking/mutex.c:804
> rtnl_lock+0x1c/0x28 net/core/rtnetlink.c:79
> do_ipv6_setsockopt+0x1a04/0x3814 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:566
> ipv6_setsockopt+0xc8/0x140 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:993
> tcp_setsockopt+0x90/0xcc net/ipv4/tcp.c:3768
> sock_common_setsockopt+0x70/0xe0 net/core/sock.c:3735
> smc_setsockopt+0x150/0xcec net/smc/af_smc.c:3072
> do_sock_setsockopt+0x17c/0x354 net/socket.c:2324
> __sys_setsockopt+0xdc/0x178 net/socket.c:2347
> __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2356 [inline]
> __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2353 [inline]
> __arm64_sys_setsockopt+0xa4/0x100 net/socket.c:2353
> __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:35 [inline]
> invoke_syscall+0x6c/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:49
> el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xac/0x230 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:132
> do_el0_svc+0x40/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:151
> el0_svc+0x50/0x180 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:712
> el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x12c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:730
> el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:598
>
>
> ---
> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
>
> syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
>
> If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
> #syz fix: exact-commit-title
>
> If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
> #syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
> (See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
>
> If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
> #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
>
> If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
> #syz undup
#syz test
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_inet.c b/net/smc/smc_inet.c
index bece346..281f0450 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_inet.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_inet.c
@@ -102,14 +102,29 @@
};
#endif /* CONFIG_IPV6 */
+static struct lock_class_key smc_clcsk_slock_keys[2];
+static struct lock_class_key smc_clcsk_keys[2];
+
static int smc_inet_init_sock(struct sock *sk)
{
+ bool is_ipv6 = sk->sk_family == AF_INET6;
struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
+ int rc;
/* init common smc sock */
smc_sk_init(net, sk, IPPROTO_SMC);
/* create clcsock */
- return smc_create_clcsk(net, sk, sk->sk_family);
+ rc = smc_create_clcsk(net, sk, sk->sk_family);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ sock_lock_init_class_and_name(smc_sk(sk)->clcsk,
+ is_ipv6 ? "slock-AF_INET6-SMC-CLCSK" :
"slock-AF_INET-SMC-CLCSK",
+ &smc_clcsk_slock_keys[is_ipv6],
+ is_ipv6 ? "sk_lock-AF_INET6-SMC-CLCSK" :
"sk_lock-AF_INET-SMC-CLCSK",
+ &smc_clcsk_keys[is_ipv6]);
+
+ return 0;
}
int __init smc_inet_init(void)
--
1.8.3.1