Re: [PATCH 2/5] phy: qcom: edp: Introduce aux_cfg array for version specific aux settings

From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Date: Wed Sep 11 2024 - 06:35:15 EST


On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 13:08, Soutrik Mukhopadhyay
<quic_mukhopad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In order to support different HW versions, introduce aux_cfg array
> to move v4 specific aux configuration settings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Soutrik Mukhopadhyay <quic_mukhopad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> index da2b32fb5b45..0f860a807d1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ struct phy_ver_ops {
>
> struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg {
> bool is_edp;
> + u8 *aux_cfg;
> const struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg *swing_pre_emph_cfg;
> const struct phy_ver_ops *ver_ops;
> };
> @@ -186,11 +187,14 @@ static const struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg edp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg = {
> .pre_emphasis_hbr3_hbr2 = &edp_pre_emp_hbr2_hbr3,
> };
>
> +static u8 edp_phy_aux_cfg_v4[10] = {

static const u8, please.


> + 0x00, 0x13, 0x24, 0x00, 0x0a, 0x26, 0x0a, 0x03, 0x37, 0x03
> +};
> +
> static int qcom_edp_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
> {
> struct qcom_edp *edp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> int ret;
> - u8 cfg8;
>
> ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(edp->supplies), edp->supplies);
> if (ret)
> @@ -222,22 +226,20 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
> * even needed.
> */
> if (edp->cfg->swing_pre_emph_cfg && !edp->is_edp)
> - cfg8 = 0xb7;
> - else
> - cfg8 = 0x37;
> + edp->cfg->aux_cfg[8] = 0xb7;
>
> writel(0xfc, edp->edp + DP_PHY_MODE);
>
> - writel(0x00, edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG0);
> - writel(0x13, edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG1);
> - writel(0x24, edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG2);
> - writel(0x00, edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG3);
> - writel(0x0a, edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG4);
> - writel(0x26, edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG5);
> - writel(0x0a, edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG6);
> - writel(0x03, edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG7);
> - writel(cfg8, edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG8);
> - writel(0x03, edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG9);
> + writel(edp->cfg->aux_cfg[0], edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG0);
> + writel(edp->cfg->aux_cfg[1], edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG1);
> + writel(edp->cfg->aux_cfg[2], edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG2);
> + writel(edp->cfg->aux_cfg[3], edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG3);
> + writel(edp->cfg->aux_cfg[4], edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG4);
> + writel(edp->cfg->aux_cfg[5], edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG5);
> + writel(edp->cfg->aux_cfg[6], edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG6);
> + writel(edp->cfg->aux_cfg[7], edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG7);
> + writel(edp->cfg->aux_cfg[8], edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG8);
> + writel(edp->cfg->aux_cfg[9], edp->edp + DP_PHY_AUX_CFG9);
>
> writel(PHY_AUX_STOP_ERR_MASK | PHY_AUX_DEC_ERR_MASK |
> PHY_AUX_SYNC_ERR_MASK | PHY_AUX_ALIGN_ERR_MASK |
> @@ -519,16 +521,19 @@ static const struct phy_ver_ops qcom_edp_phy_ops_v4 = {
> };
>
> static const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg sc7280_dp_phy_cfg = {
> + .aux_cfg = edp_phy_aux_cfg_v4,
> .ver_ops = &qcom_edp_phy_ops_v4,
> };
>
> static const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg sc8280xp_dp_phy_cfg = {
> + .aux_cfg = edp_phy_aux_cfg_v4,
> .swing_pre_emph_cfg = &dp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg,
> .ver_ops = &qcom_edp_phy_ops_v4,
> };
>
> static const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg sc8280xp_edp_phy_cfg = {
> .is_edp = true,
> + .aux_cfg = edp_phy_aux_cfg_v4,
> .swing_pre_emph_cfg = &edp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg,
> .ver_ops = &qcom_edp_phy_ops_v4,
> };
> @@ -707,6 +712,7 @@ static const struct phy_ver_ops qcom_edp_phy_ops_v6 = {
> };
>
> static struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg x1e80100_phy_cfg = {
> + .aux_cfg = edp_phy_aux_cfg_v4,

Is this correct? Judging by ver_ops, X Elite uses v6 of the PHY, so
maybe it should also use v5 AUX tables?

> .swing_pre_emph_cfg = &dp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg,
> .ver_ops = &qcom_edp_phy_ops_v6,
> };
> --
> 2.17.1
>


--
With best wishes
Dmitry