[PATCH 18/24] timekeeping: Rework timekeeping_init() to use shadow_timekeeper

[Anna-Maria Behnsen]

For timekeeping_init() the sequence count write held time is not relevant
and it could keep working on the real timekeeper, but there is no reason to
make it different from other timekeeper updates.

Convert it to operate on the shadow timekeeper.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 9b4fd620f895..223429b1ca06 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ static bool persistent_clock_exists;
 void __init timekeeping_init(void)
 {
 	struct timespec64 wall_time, boot_offset, wall_to_mono;
-	struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
+	struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.shadow_timekeeper;
 	struct clocksource *clock;
 
 	tkd_basic_setup(&tk_core);
@@ -1802,7 +1802,7 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void)
 	wall_to_mono = timespec64_sub(boot_offset, wall_time);
 
 	guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&tk_core.lock);
-	write_seqcount_begin(&tk_core.seq);
+
 	ntp_init();
 
 	clock = clocksource_default_clock();
@@ -1815,9 +1815,7 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void)
 
 	tk_set_wall_to_mono(tk, wall_to_mono);
 
-	timekeeping_update(&tk_core, tk, TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
-
-	write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
+	timekeeping_update_staged(&tk_core, TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
 }
 
 /* time in seconds when suspend began for persistent clock */

-- 
2.39.2