Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] perf trace: Collect augmented data using BPF

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 02:11:35PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 12:53 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 12:33:20AM +0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> > ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ pahole -C syscall_enter_args /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/bpf_skel/.tmp/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.o
> > struct syscall_enter_args {
> >         unsigned long long         common_tp_fields;     /*     0     8 */
> >         long                       syscall_nr;           /*     8     8 */
> >         unsigned long              args[6];              /*    16    48 */
> >
> >         /* size: 64, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
> > };
> >
> > So the entry has the theoretical max limit for the augmented payload
> > which would be 6 * sizeof(struct augmented_arg) + the common header for
> > tracepoints (unaugmented), a lot of space, but...
> 
> Yes, if I don't use this much space, and try to do a flexible payload
> length, I won't be able to pass the BPF verifier. I will try to fix
> this wasting problem.

But then we don't use it, I need to look at the implementation of BPF
maps, to see how bad is this, but I doubt it is that much, well see.

- Arnaldo