Re: [PATCH 3/8] mikrobus: Add mikrobus driver

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 07:57:20PM +0530, Ayush Singh wrote:
> A simple platform driver for now that does nothing. This is required
> because without a platform driver, the mikrobus_gpio0 nexus node cannot
> be used.
> 
> In future, this driver will also allow for dynamic board detection using
> 1-wire eeprom in new mikrobus boards.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayush@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS              |  1 +
>  drivers/misc/Kconfig     | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/misc/Makefile    |  1 +
>  drivers/misc/mikrobus.rs | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 0cc27446b18a..d0c18bd7b558 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -15433,6 +15433,7 @@ MIKROBUS CONNECTOR
>  M:	Ayush Singh <ayush@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  S:	Maintained
>  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/mikrobus-connector.yaml
> +F:	drivers/misc/mikrobus.rs
>  
>  MIKROTIK CRS3XX 98DX3236 BOARD SUPPORT
>  M:	Luka Kovacic <luka.kovacic@xxxxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> index 3fe7e2a9bd29..30defb522e98 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> @@ -610,6 +610,23 @@ config MARVELL_CN10K_DPI
>  	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
>  	  will be called mrvl_cn10k_dpi.
>  
> +menuconfig MIKROBUS
> +	tristate "Module for instantiating devices on mikroBUS ports"
> +	help
> +	  This option enables the mikroBUS driver. mikroBUS is an add-on
> +	  board socket standard that offers maximum expandability with
> +	  the smallest number of pins. The mikroBUS driver instantiates
> +	  devices on a mikroBUS port described by identifying data present
> +	  in an add-on board resident EEPROM, more details on the mikroBUS
> +	  driver support and discussion can be found in this eLinux wiki :
> +	  elinux.org/Mikrobus

So you want to be a bus?  Or just a single driver?  I'm confused, what
exactly is this supposed to do?

If a bus, great, let's tie into the proper driver core bus code, don't
"open code" all of that, as that's just going to make things messier and
harder to work overall in the end.

If a single driver, why is it called "bus"?  :)

thanks,

greg k-h