Re: [PATCH] ep93xx: clock: Fix off by one in ep93xx_div_recalc_rate()

[Alexander Sverdlin]

Hi Arnd, Nikita,

On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 14:54 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024, at 08:14, Nikita Shubin wrote:
> > Hi Dan!
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Alexander, Arnd
> > 
> > unfortunately, the ep93xx DT conversion series is also affected by this
> > bug.
> 
> Here is what I did now:
> 
> 1. applied Dan's patch on a new branch
> 2. applied the DT conversion series on top of that,
>    removing that file.
> 3. applied the first patch (with minor context changes)
>    in drivers/clk/clk-ep93xx.c again, along with
>    the MODULE_LICENSE fix I did.
> 4. finally, merged the entire branch into my for-next
>    branch so it actually makes it into linux-next
> 
> My plan now is to keep the branch in linux-next for at
> least a week and send all the other pull requests for
> the merge window first. If no other problems show up
> (either with this branch or my other 6.12 contents),
> I hope to send it all later in the merge window. If
> something goes wrong, I'll send only the bugfix as part
> of my first fixes branch for 6.12 and we'll defer the
> DT conversion once more.
> 
> I should have merged it earlier, but wasn't sure about
> interdependencies with the parts that already got merged
> elsewhere and with the comments about DTC warnings.
> 
> From what I can tell, the current state is as good as
> it gets, as we'll always get more comments or conflicts
> with new reversions of the series. Let's hope we can
> address any other issues on top of what I've merged
> now and stop rebasing.

thanks Arnd for resolving this finally and Nikita for
your relentless efforts!

PS. I've archived Subject patch now in soc patchwork
(because I think I've messed up the author info, but
all of this seems to be obsolete now)

-- 
Alexander Sverdlin.