Re: [PATCH v8 11/11] PCI: imx6: Add i.MX8Q PCIe root complex (RC) support

[Frank Li]

On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 09:07:21AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Qianqiang]
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 04:18:18PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > From: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Implement i.MX8Q (i.MX8QM, i.MX8QXP, and i.MX8DXL) PCIe RC support. While
> > the controller resembles that of iMX8MP, the PHY differs significantly.
> > Notably, there's a distinction between PCI bus addresses and CPU addresses.
> >
> > Introduce IMX_PCIE_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_FIXUP in drvdata::flags to indicate driver
> > need the cpu_addr_fixup() callback to facilitate CPU address to PCI bus
> > address conversion according to "ranges" property.
>
> > +static u64 imx_pcie_cpu_addr_fixup(struct dw_pcie *pcie, u64 cpu_addr)
> > +{
> > +	struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie = to_imx_pcie(pcie);
> > +	struct dw_pcie_rp *pp = &pcie->pp;
> > +	struct resource_entry *entry;
> > +	unsigned int offset;
> > +
> > +	if (!(imx_pcie->drvdata->flags & IMX_PCIE_FLAG_CPU_ADDR_FIXUP))
> > +		return cpu_addr;
> > +
> > +	entry = resource_list_first_type(&pp->bridge->windows, IORESOURCE_MEM);
> > +	offset = entry->offset;
> > +	return (cpu_addr - offset);
> > +}
>
> I'm sure that with enough effort, we could prove "entry" cannot be
> NULL here, but I'm not sure I want to spend the effort, and we're
> going to end up with more patches like this:
>
>   https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240911125055.58555-1-qianqiang.liu@xxxxxxx
>
> I propose this minor change:
>
>   entry = resource_list_first_type(&pp->bridge->windows, IORESOURCE_MEM);
>   if (!entry)
>     return cpu_addr;
>
>   return cpu_addr - entry->offset;
>
> I still think we should get rid of the .cpu_addr_fixup() callback if
> possible.  But that's a discussion for another day.

Stop these fake alarm from some tools's scan. entry never be NULL here.
I am working on EP side by involve a "ranges" support like RC side.

Or just omit this kinds of patches.

Frank

>
> Bjorn