Re: [PATCH 2/2] firmware: qcom: scm: fall back to kcalloc() for no SCM device bound

[Rudraksha Gupta]

> I'm wondering about how to approach an eventual refactoring and I'm
> thinking that for platforms that are known to have DTs out there
> without the node, we could exceptionally instantiate the SCM device
> when the module is loaded? And then modify the driver to require the
> provider to have an actual struct device attached.


I'm happy to help test these changes if you'd like!