Re: [PATCH v2] SLUB: Add support for per object memory policies
From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Thu Sep 12 2024 - 13:29:14 EST
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:15:34AM -0700, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote:
> > sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> > >> mm/slub.c:222:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'strict_numa' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
>
> Ummm.. This code declares strict_numa. Whats wrong with sparc64 / sparse ?
>
> > vim +/strict_numa +222 mm/slub.c
> >
> > 220
> > 221 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> > > 222 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(strict_numa);
maybe this should be:
static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(strict_numa);
if it's only used within mm/slub.c? Or it needs to be declared in a
header file if it is used outside mm/slub.c.
> > 223 #endif
> > 224
> >
>
>