Re: [PATCH 2/6] tpm: do not ignore memblock_reserve return value

[Ilias Apalodimas]

Hi Gregory,

On Fri, 6 Sept 2024 at 23:28, Gregory Price <gourry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> tpm code currently ignores a relevant failure case silently.
> Add an error to make this failure non-silent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c
> index 9c3613e6af15..6e03eed0dc6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c
> @@ -61,7 +61,11 @@ int __init efi_tpm_eventlog_init(void)
>         }
>
>         tbl_size = sizeof(*log_tbl) + log_tbl->size;
> -       memblock_reserve(efi.tpm_log, tbl_size);
> +       if (memblock_reserve(efi.tpm_log, tbl_size)) {
> +               pr_err("TPM Event Log memblock reserve fails (0x%lx, 0x%x)\n",
> +                      efi.tpm_log, tbl_size);
> +               goto out;
> +       }

ret is going to be 0 here. I haven't followed the rest of the code and
where this function is used, but you probably need to return -ENOMEM

Thanks
/Ilias
>
>         if (efi.tpm_final_log == EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR) {
>                 pr_info("TPM Final Events table not present\n");
> --
> 2.43.0
>