Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] perf cs-etm: Use new OpenCSD consistency checks

From: James Clark
Date: Fri Sep 13 2024 - 08:09:07 EST




On 13/09/2024 12:54, Leo Yan wrote:
On 9/12/24 16:11, James Clark wrote:>

Previously when the incorrect binary was used for decode, Perf would
silently continue to generate incorrect samples. With OpenCSD 1.5.4 we
can enable consistency checks that do a best effort to detect a mismatch
in the image. When one is detected a warning is printed and sample
generation stops until the trace resynchronizes with a good part of the
image.

Reported-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240719092619.274730-1-gankulkarni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c | 7 ++++++-
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c
index b78ef0262135..b85a8837bddc 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c
@@ -685,9 +685,14 @@ cs_etm_decoder__create_etm_decoder(struct cs_etm_decoder_params *d_params,
         }

         if (d_params->operation == CS_ETM_OPERATION_DECODE) {
+               int decode_flags = OCSD_CREATE_FLG_FULL_DECODER;
+#ifdef OCSD_OPFLG_N_UNCOND_DIR_BR_CHK
+               decode_flags |= OCSD_OPFLG_N_UNCOND_DIR_BR_CHK | OCSD_OPFLG_CHK_RANGE_CONTINUE |
+                               ETM4_OPFLG_PKTDEC_AA64_OPCODE_CHK;
+#endif

Looks good to me.

Just one question: should the flag ETM4_OPFLG_PKTDEC_AA64_OPCODE_CHK be set
according to ETM version? E.g. it should be only set for ETMv4 or this is
fine for ETE as well.

Thanks,
Leo


I asked Mike the same question about ETMv3 and he said none of the flags overlap and it was ok to always pass them. So I assume the same applies to ETE as well.