Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/95] 4.19.322-rc2 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 08:44:13PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sept 2024 at 16:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.322 release.
> > There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:42:36 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.322-rc2.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> 
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ## Build
> * kernel: 4.19.322-rc2
> * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> * git commit: 00a71bfa9b89c96b41773efee1cca378cc1fa5e6
> * git describe: v4.19.321-96-g00a71bfa9b89
> * test details:
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.321-96-g00a71bfa9b89
> 
> ## Test Regressions (compared to v4.19.320-99-g0cc44dd838a6)
> 
> ## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.19.320-99-g0cc44dd838a6)
> 
> ## Test Fixes (compared to v4.19.320-99-g0cc44dd838a6)
> 
> ## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.19.320-99-g0cc44dd838a6)
> 
> ## Test result summary
> total: 116497, pass: 103587, fail: 542, skip: 12283, xfail: 85
> 
> ## Build Summary
> * arc: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
> * arm: 204 total, 192 passed, 12 failed
> * arm64: 54 total, 44 passed, 10 failed
> * i386: 30 total, 24 passed, 6 failed
> * mips: 40 total, 40 passed, 0 failed
> * parisc: 6 total, 0 passed, 6 failed
> * powerpc: 48 total, 48 passed, 0 failed
> * s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
> * sh: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
> * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
> * x86_64: 46 total, 36 passed, 10 failed
> 
> ## Test suites summary
> * boot
> * kunit
> * libhugetlbfs
> * log-parser-boot
> * log-parser-test
> * ltp-commands
> * ltp-containers
> * ltp-controllers
> * ltp-cpuhotplug
> * ltp-crypto
> * ltp-cve
> * ltp-dio
> * ltp-fcntl-locktests
> * ltp-fs
> * ltp-fs_bind
> * ltp-fs_perms_simple
> * ltp-hugetlb
> * ltp-ipc
> * ltp-math
> * ltp-mm
> * ltp-nptl
> * ltp-pty
> * ltp-sched
> * ltp-smoke
> * ltp-syscalls
> * ltp-tracing
> * rcutorture
> 
> --
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org
> 

Thanks for testing and letting me know,

greg k-h