[PATCH net-next 3/4] net: dsa: populate dp->link_dp for cascade ports

[Vladimir Oltean]

Drivers may need to walk the tree hop by hop, activity which is
currently impossible. This is because dst->rtable offers no guarantee as
to whether we are looking at a dsa_link that represents a direct
connection or not.

Partially address the long-standing TODO that we have, and do introduce
a link_dp member in struct dsa_port. This will actually represent the
adjacent cascade port.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx>
---
 include/net/dsa.h |  9 +++++----
 net/dsa/dsa.c     | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
index d7a6c2930277..586efb76f67d 100644
--- a/include/net/dsa.h
+++ b/include/net/dsa.h
@@ -265,6 +265,7 @@ struct dsa_port {
 
 	const char		*name;
 	struct dsa_port		*cpu_dp;
+	struct dsa_port		*link_dp;
 	u8			mac[ETH_ALEN];
 
 	u8			stp_state;
@@ -332,10 +333,10 @@ dsa_phylink_to_port(struct phylink_config *config)
 	return container_of(config, struct dsa_port, pl_config);
 }
 
-/* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member,
- * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed,
- * but this would require some more complex tree walking,
- * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all.
+/* TODO: DSA ports do have a dp->link_dp member which represents their direct
+ * connection. However, dsa_routing_port() requires full routing information,
+ * which _could_ be deduced based on just the adjacency, but it requires some
+ * complex tree walking. So keep it stupid at the moment and list them all.
  */
 struct dsa_link {
 	struct dsa_port *dp;
diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
index a543ddaefdd8..8b4ec00de521 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
@@ -285,7 +285,8 @@ static struct dsa_port *dsa_tree_find_port_by_node(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
 }
 
 static struct dsa_link *dsa_link_touch(struct dsa_port *dp,
-				       struct dsa_port *link_dp)
+				       struct dsa_port *link_dp,
+				       bool adjacent)
 {
 	struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
 	struct dsa_switch_tree *dst;
@@ -307,9 +308,23 @@ static struct dsa_link *dsa_link_touch(struct dsa_port *dp,
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dl->list);
 	list_add_tail(&dl->list, &dst->rtable);
 
+	if (adjacent)
+		dp->link_dp = link_dp;
+
 	return dl;
 }
 
+/**
+ * dsa_port_setup_routing_table(): Set up tree routing table based on
+ *	information from this cascade port
+ * @dp: cascade port
+ *
+ * Parse the device tree node for the "link" array of phandles to other cascade
+ * ports, creating routing table elements from this source to each destination
+ * list element found. One assumption is being made, which is backed by the
+ * device tree bindings: that the first "link" element is the directly
+ * connected cascade port.
+ */
 static bool dsa_port_setup_routing_table(struct dsa_port *dp)
 {
 	struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
@@ -317,6 +332,7 @@ static bool dsa_port_setup_routing_table(struct dsa_port *dp)
 	struct device_node *dn = dp->dn;
 	struct of_phandle_iterator it;
 	struct dsa_port *link_dp;
+	bool adjacent = true;
 	struct dsa_link *dl;
 	int err;
 
@@ -327,11 +343,13 @@ static bool dsa_port_setup_routing_table(struct dsa_port *dp)
 			return false;
 		}
 
-		dl = dsa_link_touch(dp, link_dp);
+		dl = dsa_link_touch(dp, link_dp, adjacent);
 		if (!dl) {
 			of_node_put(it.node);
 			return false;
 		}
+
+		adjacent = false;
 	}
 
 	return true;
-- 
2.34.1