[PATCH v1 2/6] misc: eeprom: eeprom_93cx6: Switch to BIT() macro

[Parker Newman]

From: Parker Newman <pnewman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Use the BIT() macro rather than (1 << (i - 1))

Signed-off-by: Parker Newman <pnewman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93cx6.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93cx6.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93cx6.c
index 0f52d3c4bc1d..64da22edefa4 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93cx6.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/eeprom_93cx6.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
  * Supported chipsets: 93c46 & 93c66.
  */

+#include <linux/bits.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
@@ -107,7 +108,7 @@ static void eeprom_93cx6_write_bits(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom,
 		/*
 		 * Check if this bit needs to be set.
 		 */
-		eeprom->reg_data_in = !!(data & (1 << (i - 1)));
+		eeprom->reg_data_in = !!(data & BIT(i - 1));

 		/*
 		 * Write the bit to the eeprom register.
@@ -157,7 +158,7 @@ static void eeprom_93cx6_read_bits(struct eeprom_93cx6 *eeprom,
 		 * Read if the bit has been set.
 		 */
 		if (eeprom->reg_data_out)
-			buf |= (1 << (i - 1));
+			buf |= BIT(i - 1);

 		eeprom_93cx6_pulse_low(eeprom);
 	}
--
2.46.0