Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)

From: David Howells
Date: Fri Sep 13 2024 - 12:04:28 EST

Next message: Chuck Lever: "Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Fill NFSv4.1 server implementation fields in OP_EXCHANGE_ID response"
Previous message: Mathieu Poirier: "Re: [PATCH v9 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware"
In reply to: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)"
Next in thread: Chris Mason: "Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I've mentioned this in the past to both Willy and Dave Chinner, but so
> far all of my attempts to reproduce it on purpose have failed.

Could it be a splice bug?

David

Next message: Chuck Lever: "Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Fill NFSv4.1 server implementation fields in OP_EXCHANGE_ID response"
Previous message: Mathieu Poirier: "Re: [PATCH v9 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware"
In reply to: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)"
Next in thread: Chris Mason: "Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]