Re: [PATCH] regulator: update some comments ([gs]et_voltage_vsel vs [gs]et_voltage_sel)

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 12:43:58 +0100, André Draszik wrote:
> Some comments here are referring to a non-existent
> regulator_ops::get_voltage_vsel() where ::get_voltage_sel() is meant,
> and similar for ::set_voltage_vsel() / ::set_voltage_sel().
> 
> Update the comments.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: update some comments ([gs]et_voltage_vsel vs [gs]et_voltage_sel)
      commit: fb9ce84a01582c9d67dc51d5330136ea684172ef

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark