Re: [PATCH v11 20/20] x86/cpu/amd: Do not print FW_BUG for Secure TSC
From: Jim Mattson
Date: Fri Sep 13 2024 - 13:42:40 EST
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 8:16 AM Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> When Secure TSC is enabled and TscInvariant (bit 8) in CPUID_8000_0007_edx
> is set, the kernel complains with the below firmware bug:
>
> [Firmware Bug]: TSC doesn't count with P0 frequency!
>
> Secure TSC does not need to run at P0 frequency; the TSC frequency is set
> by the VMM as part of the SNP_LAUNCH_START command. Skip this check when
> Secure TSC is enabled
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@xxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> index be5889bded49..87b55d2183a0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> @@ -370,7 +370,8 @@ static void bsp_determine_snp(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>
> static void bsp_init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> {
> - if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC)) {
> + if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC) &&
> + !cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SECURE_TSC)) {
Could we extend this to never complain in a virtual machine? i.e.
...
- if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC)) {
+ if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC) &&
+ !cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR)) {
...