Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] riscv: Add support for the tagged address ABI

From: Charlie Jenkins
Date: Fri Sep 13 2024 - 23:17:02 EST

Next message: Jakub Kicinski: "Re: [PATCH net-next v2] page_pool: fix build on powerpc with GCC 14"
Previous message: Zhiguo Niu: "[PATCH] f2fs-toos: use getpagesize() to get default blocksize in Android"
In reply to: Samuel Holland: "Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] riscv: Add support for the tagged address ABI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 09:57:05PM -0500, Samuel Holland wrote:
> Hi Charlie,
>
> On 2024-09-12 9:45 PM, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 06:01:27PM -0700, Samuel Holland wrote:
> >> When pointer masking is enabled for userspace, the kernel can accept
> >> tagged pointers as arguments to some system calls. Allow this by
> >> untagging the pointers in access_ok() and the uaccess routines. The
> >> uaccess routines must peform untagging in software because U-mode and
> >> S-mode have entirely separate pointer masking configurations. In fact,
> >> hardware may not even implement pointer masking for S-mode.
> >>
> >> Since the number of tag bits is variable, untagged_addr_remote() needs
> >> to know what PMLEN to use for the remote mm. Therefore, the pointer
> >> masking mode must be the same for all threads sharing an mm. Enforce
> >> this with a lock flag in the mm context, as x86 does for LAM. The flag
> >> gets reset in init_new_context() during fork(), as the new mm is no
> >> longer multithreaded.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >
> > Not necessary, but what do you think about adding riscv to include/uapi/linux/prctl.h:
> >
> > /* Tagged user address controls for arm64 */
> > #define PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL 55
> > #define PR_GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL 56
> > # define PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE (1UL << 0)
>
> Yes, I'll add this in v5.
>
> > Also looks like this last line should probably be under SET rather than
> > GET.
>
> The same bit fields are used for both prctl() functions, so I think the current
> grouping is okay (compare PR_RISCV_V_GET_CONTROL).

Oh perfect, I had missed that when I briefly looked.

>
> Regards,
> Samuel
>
> > Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >>
> >> Changes in v4:
> >> - Combine __untagged_addr() and __untagged_addr_remote()
> >>
> >> Changes in v3:
> >> - Use IS_ENABLED instead of #ifdef when possible
> >> - Implement mm_untag_mask()
> >> - Remove pmlen from struct thread_info (now only in mm_context_t)
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> - Implement untagged_addr_remote()
> >> - Restrict PMLEN changes once a process is multithreaded
> >>
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu.h | 7 +++
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 13 +++++
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h | 43 ++++++++++++++--
> >> arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >> 4 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu.h
> >> index c9e03e9da3dc..1cc90465d75b 100644
> >> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu.h
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu.h
> >> @@ -25,9 +25,16 @@ typedef struct {
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_FDPIC
> >> unsigned long exec_fdpic_loadmap;
> >> unsigned long interp_fdpic_loadmap;
> >> +#endif
> >> + unsigned long flags;
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM
> >> + u8 pmlen;
> >> #endif
> >> } mm_context_t;
> >>
> >> +/* Lock the pointer masking mode because this mm is multithreaded */
> >> +#define MM_CONTEXT_LOCK_PMLEN 0
> >> +
> >> #define cntx2asid(cntx) ((cntx) & SATP_ASID_MASK)
> >> #define cntx2version(cntx) ((cntx) & ~SATP_ASID_MASK)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> >> index 7030837adc1a..8c4bc49a3a0f 100644
> >> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> >> @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
> >> static inline void activate_mm(struct mm_struct *prev,
> >> struct mm_struct *next)
> >> {
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM
> >> + next->context.pmlen = 0;
> >> +#endif
> >> switch_mm(prev, next, NULL);
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -30,11 +33,21 @@ static inline int init_new_context(struct task_struct *tsk,
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> >> atomic_long_set(&mm->context.id, 0);
> >> #endif
> >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM))
> >> + clear_bit(MM_CONTEXT_LOCK_PMLEN, &mm->context.flags);
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator);
> >>
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM
> >> +#define mm_untag_mask mm_untag_mask
> >> +static inline unsigned long mm_untag_mask(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >> +{
> >> + return -1UL >> mm->context.pmlen;
> >> +}
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> #include <asm-generic/mmu_context.h>
> >>
> >> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_MMU_CONTEXT_H */
> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h
> >> index 72ec1d9bd3f3..fee56b0c8058 100644
> >> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/uaccess.h
> >> @@ -9,8 +9,41 @@
> >> #define _ASM_RISCV_UACCESS_H
> >>
> >> #include <asm/asm-extable.h>
> >> +#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> >> #include <asm/pgtable.h> /* for TASK_SIZE */
> >>
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM
> >> +static inline unsigned long __untagged_addr_remote(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
> >> +{
> >> + if (riscv_has_extension_unlikely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPM)) {
> >> + u8 pmlen = mm->context.pmlen;
> >> +
> >> + /* Virtual addresses are sign-extended; physical addresses are zero-extended. */
> >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMU))
> >> + return (long)(addr << pmlen) >> pmlen;
> >> + else
> >> + return (addr << pmlen) >> pmlen;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return addr;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +#define untagged_addr(addr) ({ \
> >> + unsigned long __addr = (__force unsigned long)(addr); \
> >> + (__force __typeof__(addr))__untagged_addr_remote(current->mm, __addr); \
> >> +})
> >> +
> >> +#define untagged_addr_remote(mm, addr) ({ \
> >> + unsigned long __addr = (__force unsigned long)(addr); \
> >> + mmap_assert_locked(mm); \
> >> + (__force __typeof__(addr))__untagged_addr_remote(mm, __addr); \
> >> +})
> >> +
> >> +#define access_ok(addr, size) likely(__access_ok(untagged_addr(addr), size))
> >> +#else
> >> +#define untagged_addr(addr) (addr)
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> * User space memory access functions
> >> */
> >> @@ -130,7 +163,7 @@ do { \
> >> */
> >> #define __get_user(x, ptr) \
> >> ({ \
> >> - const __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_ptr = (ptr); \
> >> + const __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_ptr = untagged_addr(ptr); \
> >> long __gu_err = 0; \
> >> \
> >> __chk_user_ptr(__gu_ptr); \
> >> @@ -246,7 +279,7 @@ do { \
> >> */
> >> #define __put_user(x, ptr) \
> >> ({ \
> >> - __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_ptr = (ptr); \
> >> + __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_ptr = untagged_addr(ptr); \
> >> __typeof__(*__gu_ptr) __val = (x); \
> >> long __pu_err = 0; \
> >> \
> >> @@ -293,13 +326,13 @@ unsigned long __must_check __asm_copy_from_user(void *to,
> >> static inline unsigned long
> >> raw_copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
> >> {
> >> - return __asm_copy_from_user(to, from, n);
> >> + return __asm_copy_from_user(to, untagged_addr(from), n);
> >> }
> >>
> >> static inline unsigned long
> >> raw_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
> >> {
> >> - return __asm_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
> >> + return __asm_copy_to_user(untagged_addr(to), from, n);
> >> }
> >>
> >> extern long strncpy_from_user(char *dest, const char __user *src, long count);
> >> @@ -314,7 +347,7 @@ unsigned long __must_check clear_user(void __user *to, unsigned long n)
> >> {
> >> might_fault();
> >> return access_ok(to, n) ?
> >> - __clear_user(to, n) : n;
> >> + __clear_user(untagged_addr(to), n) : n;
> >> }
> >>
> >> #define __get_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label) \
> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
> >> index f39221ab5ddd..6e9c84a41c29 100644
> >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
> >> @@ -204,6 +204,10 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
> >> unsigned long tls = args->tls;
> >> struct pt_regs *childregs = task_pt_regs(p);
> >>
> >> + /* Ensure all threads in this mm have the same pointer masking mode. */
> >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM) && p->mm && (clone_flags & CLONE_VM))
> >> + set_bit(MM_CONTEXT_LOCK_PMLEN, &p->mm->context.flags);
> >> +
> >> memset(&p->thread.s, 0, sizeof(p->thread.s));
> >>
> >> /* p->thread holds context to be restored by __switch_to() */
> >> @@ -249,10 +253,16 @@ enum {
> >> static bool have_user_pmlen_7;
> >> static bool have_user_pmlen_16;
> >>
> >> +/*
> >> + * Control the relaxed ABI allowing tagged user addresses into the kernel.
> >> + */
> >> +static unsigned int tagged_addr_disabled;
> >> +
> >> long set_tagged_addr_ctrl(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long arg)
> >> {
> >> - unsigned long valid_mask = PR_PMLEN_MASK;
> >> + unsigned long valid_mask = PR_PMLEN_MASK | PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE;
> >> struct thread_info *ti = task_thread_info(task);
> >> + struct mm_struct *mm = task->mm;
> >> unsigned long pmm;
> >> u8 pmlen;
> >>
> >> @@ -267,16 +277,41 @@ long set_tagged_addr_ctrl(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long arg)
> >> * in case choosing a larger PMLEN has a performance impact.
> >> */
> >> pmlen = FIELD_GET(PR_PMLEN_MASK, arg);
> >> - if (pmlen == PMLEN_0)
> >> + if (pmlen == PMLEN_0) {
> >> pmm = ENVCFG_PMM_PMLEN_0;
> >> - else if (pmlen <= PMLEN_7 && have_user_pmlen_7)
> >> + } else if (pmlen <= PMLEN_7 && have_user_pmlen_7) {
> >> + pmlen = PMLEN_7;
> >> pmm = ENVCFG_PMM_PMLEN_7;
> >> - else if (pmlen <= PMLEN_16 && have_user_pmlen_16)
> >> + } else if (pmlen <= PMLEN_16 && have_user_pmlen_16) {
> >> + pmlen = PMLEN_16;
> >> pmm = ENVCFG_PMM_PMLEN_16;
> >> - else
> >> + } else {
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * Do not allow the enabling of the tagged address ABI if globally
> >> + * disabled via sysctl abi.tagged_addr_disabled, if pointer masking
> >> + * is disabled for userspace.
> >> + */
> >> + if (arg & PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE && (tagged_addr_disabled || !pmlen))
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + if (!(arg & PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE))
> >> + pmlen = PMLEN_0;
> >> +
> >> + if (mmap_write_lock_killable(mm))
> >> + return -EINTR;
> >> +
> >> + if (test_bit(MM_CONTEXT_LOCK_PMLEN, &mm->context.flags) && mm->context.pmlen != pmlen) {
> >> + mmap_write_unlock(mm);
> >> + return -EBUSY;
> >> + }
> >>
> >> envcfg_update_bits(task, ENVCFG_PMM, pmm);
> >> + mm->context.pmlen = pmlen;
> >> +
> >> + mmap_write_unlock(mm);
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >> @@ -289,6 +324,10 @@ long get_tagged_addr_ctrl(struct task_struct *task)
> >> if (is_compat_thread(ti))
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> + /*
> >> + * The mm context's pmlen is set only when the tagged address ABI is
> >> + * enabled, so the effective PMLEN must be extracted from envcfg.PMM.
> >> + */
> >> switch (task->thread.envcfg & ENVCFG_PMM) {
> >> case ENVCFG_PMM_PMLEN_7:
> >> ret = FIELD_PREP(PR_PMLEN_MASK, PMLEN_7);
> >> @@ -298,6 +337,9 @@ long get_tagged_addr_ctrl(struct task_struct *task)
> >> break;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + if (task->mm->context.pmlen)
> >> + ret |= PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE;
> >> +
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -307,6 +349,24 @@ static bool try_to_set_pmm(unsigned long value)
> >> return (csr_read_clear(CSR_ENVCFG, ENVCFG_PMM) & ENVCFG_PMM) == value;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +/*
> >> + * Global sysctl to disable the tagged user addresses support. This control
> >> + * only prevents the tagged address ABI enabling via prctl() and does not
> >> + * disable it for tasks that already opted in to the relaxed ABI.
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +static struct ctl_table tagged_addr_sysctl_table[] = {
> >> + {
> >> + .procname = "tagged_addr_disabled",
> >> + .mode = 0644,
> >> + .data = &tagged_addr_disabled,
> >> + .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> >> + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
> >> + .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
> >> + .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
> >> + },
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> static int __init tagged_addr_init(void)
> >> {
> >> if (!riscv_has_extension_unlikely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPM))
> >> @@ -320,6 +380,9 @@ static int __init tagged_addr_init(void)
> >> have_user_pmlen_7 = try_to_set_pmm(ENVCFG_PMM_PMLEN_7);
> >> have_user_pmlen_16 = try_to_set_pmm(ENVCFG_PMM_PMLEN_16);
> >>
> >> + if (!register_sysctl("abi", tagged_addr_sysctl_table))
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >> core_initcall(tagged_addr_init);
> >> --
> >> 2.45.1
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> linux-riscv mailing list
> >> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>

Next message: Jakub Kicinski: "Re: [PATCH net-next v2] page_pool: fix build on powerpc with GCC 14"
Previous message: Zhiguo Niu: "[PATCH] f2fs-toos: use getpagesize() to get default blocksize in Android"
In reply to: Samuel Holland: "Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] riscv: Add support for the tagged address ABI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]