On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 10:42:44AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:Got it. I will send a v2 patch to net and keeping reverse xmas tree order.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 07:01:20PM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
Clang static checker (scan-build) warning:Hi Su Hui,
net/tipc/bcast.c:305:4:
The expression is an uninitialized value. The computed value will also
be garbage [core.uninitialized.Assign]
305 | (*cong_link_cnt)++;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
tipc_rcast_xmit() will increase cong_link_cnt's value, but cong_link_cnt
is uninitialized. Although it won't really cause a problem, it's better
to fix it.
Fixes: dca4a17d24ee ("tipc: fix potential hanging after b/rcast changing")
Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
This looks like a bug fix. If so it should be targeted at net rather than
net-next. If not, the Fixes tag should be dropped, and the commit can be
referenced in the patch description with some other text around:
It's one of those borderline things. As the commit message says it doesn't
really cause a problem because cong_link_cnt is never used. I guess if you had
UBSan turned on it would generate a runtime warning. Still it also doesn't seem
intentional so I would probably count it as a bugfix and target net like you
suggest.