Re: [PATCH 3/3] uprobes: implement SRCU-protected lifetime for single-stepped uprobe

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 09/09, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> Similarly to how we SRCU-protect uprobe instance (and avoid refcounting
> it unnecessarily) when waiting for return probe hit, use hprobe approach
> to do the same with single-stepped uprobe. Same hprobe_* primitives are
> used. We also reuse ri_timer() callback to expire both pending
> single-step uprobe and return instances.

Well, I still think it would be better (and much simpler) to simply kill
utask->active_uprobe, iirc I even sent the RFC patch...

Oleg.