Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Mon Sep 16 2024 - 02:48:11 EST


Hi all,

On Thu, 5 Sep 2024 16:08:56 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>
> between commit:
>
> b86c9bea6349 ("KVM: arm64: Save/restore POE registers")
>
> from the arm64 tree and commits:
>
> b55688943597 ("KVM: arm64: Move SVCR into the sysreg array")
> 7d9c1ed6f4bf ("KVM: arm64: Move FPMR into the sysreg array")
>
> from the kvm-arm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index d5857452a1ec,b9ca899041db..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@@ -446,8 -446,10 +446,12 @@@ enum vcpu_sysreg
> GCR_EL1, /* Tag Control Register */
> TFSRE0_EL1, /* Tag Fault Status Register (EL0) */
>
> + POR_EL0, /* Permission Overlay Register 0 (EL0) */
> +
> + /* FP/SIMD/SVE */
> + SVCR,
> + FPMR,
> +
> /* 32bit specific registers. */
> DACR32_EL2, /* Domain Access Control Register */
> IFSR32_EL2, /* Instruction Fault Status Register */

This is now a conflict between the kvm tree and Linus' tree.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpvIArUhM4jB.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature