Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] xen/swiotlb: add alignment check for dma buffers

[Juergen Gross]

On 16.09.24 08:56, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 16.09.24 08:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 16.09.2024 08:47, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> > > @@ -78,9 +78,15 @@ static inline int 
> > > range_straddles_page_boundary(phys_addr_t p, size_t size)
> > >   {
> > >       unsigned long next_bfn, xen_pfn = XEN_PFN_DOWN(p);
> > >       unsigned int i, nr_pages = XEN_PFN_UP(xen_offset_in_page(p) + size);
> > > +    phys_addr_t algn = 1ULL << (get_order(size) + PAGE_SHIFT);
> > >       next_bfn = pfn_to_bfn(xen_pfn);
> > > +    /* If buffer is physically aligned, ensure DMA alignment. */
> > > +    if (IS_ALIGNED(p, algn) &&
> > > +        !IS_ALIGNED(next_bfn << XEN_PAGE_SHIFT, algn))
> >
> > And this shift is not at risk of losing bits on Arm LPAE?
>
> For alignment check this just doesn't matter (assuming XEN_PAGE_SIZE is
> smaller than 4G).

Wait, that was nonsense.

I'll change the check to:

	!IS_ALIGNED((phys_addr_t)next_bfn << XEN_PAGE_SHIFT, algn)


Juergen

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature