Re: [PATCH 3/3] uprobes: implement SRCU-protected lifetime for single-stepped uprobe

[Andrii Nakryiko]

On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 4:51 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 09/09, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >
> > Similarly to how we SRCU-protect uprobe instance (and avoid refcounting
> > it unnecessarily) when waiting for return probe hit, use hprobe approach
> > to do the same with single-stepped uprobe. Same hprobe_* primitives are
> > used. We also reuse ri_timer() callback to expire both pending
> > single-step uprobe and return instances.
>
> Well, I still think it would be better (and much simpler) to simply kill
> utask->active_uprobe, iirc I even sent the RFC patch...
>

let's do it, please send non-RFC patches and get them landed!

> Oleg.
>