Re: [RESEND PATCH 3/3] riscv: dts: canaan: Add k230's pinctrl node

From: Ze Huang
Date: Wed Sep 18 2024 - 04:56:11 EST


On 9/16/24 11:52 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 16/09/2024 08:47, Ze Huang wrote:
Add pinctrl device, containing default config for uart, pwm, iis, iic and
mmc.

Signed-off-by: Ze Huang <18771902331@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k230-pinctrl.dtsi | 316 +++++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k230-pinctrl.h | 18 ++
arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k230.dtsi | 2 +
3 files changed, 336 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k230-pinctrl.dtsi
create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k230-pinctrl.h

diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k230-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k230-pinctrl.dtsi
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0737f50d2868
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/canaan/k230-pinctrl.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR MIT
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Ze Huang <18771902331@xxxxxxx>
+ */
+#include "k230-pinctrl.h"
+
+/ {
+ soc {
+ pinctrl: pinctrl@91105000 {
That's odd style - defining SoC nodes outside of SoC DTSI. Are you sure
that's preferred coding style in RISC-V or Canaan?

Pinctrl-related nodes were separated the for ease of maintenance, but the
convention in Canaan is to place them in the board-level DTS file. Would it
be better to stay consistent with their approach?

+ compatible = "canaan,k230-pinctrl";
+ reg = <0x0 0x91105000 0x0 0x100>;
+
Best regards,
Krzysztof