Re: [PATCH v3] x86/resctrl: Annotate get_mem_config() functions as __init
From: Reinette Chatre
Date: Thu Sep 19 2024 - 17:15:48 EST
On 9/17/24 9:02 AM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> After a recent LLVM change [1] that deduces __cold on functions that
> only call cold code (such as __init functions), there is a section
> mismatch warning from __get_mem_config_intel(), which got moved to
> .text.unlikely. as a result of that optimization:
>
> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: __get_mem_config_intel+0x77 (section: .text.unlikely.) -> thread_throttle_mode_init (section: .init.text)
>
> Mark __get_mem_config_intel() as __init as well since it is only called
> from __init code, which clears up the warning.
>
> While __rdt_get_mem_config_amd() does not exhibit a warning because it
> does not call any __init code, it is a similar function that is only
> called from __init code like __get_mem_config_intel(), so mark it __init
> as well to keep the code symmetrical.
>
> Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6b11573b8c5e3d36beee099dbe7347c2a007bf53 [1]
> Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
If there is a re-spin I think appropriate Fixes tags can be added:
Fixes: 05b93417ce5b ("x86/intel_rdt/mba: Add primary support for Memory Bandwidth Allocation (MBA)")
Fixes: 4d05bf71f157 ("x86/resctrl: Introduce AMD QOS feature")
I am not familiar with stable rules related to compiler impact but
this may fall into the "it bothers people" category of fixes so
a Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx sounds appropriate also.
Reinette