Re: [PATCH 1/2] kselftests: mm: Fix wrong __NR_userfaultfd value
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum
Date: Mon Sep 23 2024 - 01:36:30 EST
...
>> grep -rnIF "#define __NR_userfaultfd"
>> tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:681:#define __NR_userfaultfd 282
>> arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h:374:#define
>> __NR_userfaultfd 374
>> arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h:327:#define
>> __NR_userfaultfd 323
>> arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_x32.h:282:#define
>> __NR_userfaultfd (__X32_SYSCALL_BIT + 323)
>> arch/arm/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd-eabi.h:347:#define
>> __NR_userfaultfd (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE + 388)
>> arch/arm/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd-oabi.h:359:#define
>> __NR_userfaultfd (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE + 388)
>> include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:681:#define __NR_userfaultfd 282
>>
>> The number is dependent on the architecture. The above data shows that:
>> x86 374
>> x86_64 323
>
> Correct and the generated header files do the right thing and it is good to
> include them as this patch does.
>
> This is a good find and fix. I wish you explained this in your changelog.
> Please add more details when you send v2.
I'm sending v2
>
> There could be other issues lurking based on what I found.
>
> The other two files are the problem where they hard code it to 282 without
> taking the __NR_SYSCALL_BASE for the arch into consideration:
>
> tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:681:#define __NR_userfaultfd 282
> include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:681:#define __NR_userfaultfd 282
>
>>
>> I'm unable to find the history of why it is set to 282 in unistd.h and
>> when this problem happened.
>
> According to git history it is added in the following commit to
> include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:
>
> 09f7298100ea9767324298ab0c7979f6d7463183
> Subject: [PATCH] userfaultfd: register uapi generic syscall (aarch64)
>
> and it is added in the following commit to
> tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
> 34b009cfde2b8ce20a69c7bfd6bad4ce0e7cd970
> Subject: [PATCH] tools include: Grab copies of arm64 dependent unistd.h
> files
>
> I think, the above defines from include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h and
> tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h should be removed.
>
> Maybe others familiar with userfaultfd can determine the best course of
> action.
> We might have other NR_ defines in these two files that are causing
> problems
> for tests and tools that we haven't uncovered yet.
Added authors of these patches.
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
--
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum