Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/2] igbvf: remove unused spinlock

[Tony Nguyen]

On 9/23/2024 9:46 AM, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 6:04 AM Przemek Kitszel
> <przemyslaw.kitszel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 9/21/24 14:52, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > > Dear Wander,
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you for your patch.
> > >
> > > Am 20.09.24 um 20:59 schrieb Wander Lairson Costa:
> > > > tx_queue_lock and stats_lock are declared and initialized, but never
> > > > used. Remove them.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > It’d be great if you added a Fixes: tag.
> >
> > Alternatively you could split this series into two, and send this patch
> > to iwl-next tree, without the fixes tag. For me this patch is just
> > a cleanup, not a fix.
> >
> > >
>
> Should I send a new version of the patches separately?

The patches apply to the respective trees when split out so I can take 
these without a re-send. Patch 1 will need a Fixes: for it though...

I'm seeing it as: 9d5c824399de ("igb: PCI-Express 82575 Gigabit Ethernet 
driver")?

Thanks,
Tony

> > [...]
> >
> > > With that addressed:
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > >
> > > Paul