Re: [PATCH] mm: Make SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS depend on the existence of NR_CPUS

[Guenter Roeck]

On 9/23/24 15:08, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 9/23/24 08:23, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 23.09.24 16:25, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS already depends on "NR_CPUS >= 4", but that evaluates
> > > to true if there is no NR_CPUS configuration option (such as for m68k).
> > > This results in CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS=y for mac_defconfig.
> > > This in turn causes the m68k "q800" machine to crash in qemu.
> >
> > Oh, that's why my compile tests still worked ... I even removed the additional NR_CPUS check, assuming it's not required ...
> >
> > Thanks for debugging and fixing!
> >
> > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Apparently it wasn't that simple :-(. 0-day reports a build failure
> with s390 builds.
>
> arch/s390/mm/gmap.c:357:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'pmd_pgtable_page'.
>
> Turns out that
>      depends on NR_CPUS && NR_CPUS >= 4
>
> doesn't work and disables SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS even if NR_CPUS _is_ defined.
> I have no idea how to declare the dependency correctly.
> Sorry, I did not expect that.

The only solution I found was to define NR_CPUS for m68k. That seems to be
the only architecture not defining it, so hopefully that is an acceptable
solution. I'll send v2 of the patch shortly.

Guenter