Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5-mss: Use common error handling code in q6v5_mpss_load()
From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Date: Tue Sep 24 2024 - 15:50:00 EST
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 04:08:11PM GMT, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:55:06 +0200
>
> Add jump targets so that a bit of exception handling can be better reused
> at the end of this function implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> index 2a42215ce8e0..b398ae3083a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> @@ -1451,9 +1451,7 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_load(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> dev_err(qproc->dev,
> "failed to load segment %d from truncated file %s\n",
> i, fw_name);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
Please keep error assignment where it is. It is much cleaner to read it
this way, rather than checking the error-handling basement.
> - memunmap(ptr);
> - goto release_firmware;
> + goto e_inval_unmap;
> }
>
> memcpy(ptr, fw->data + phdr->p_offset, phdr->p_filesz);
> @@ -1464,18 +1462,15 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_load(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> ptr, phdr->p_filesz);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(qproc->dev, "failed to load %s\n", fw_name);
> - memunmap(ptr);
> - goto release_firmware;
> + goto unmap_mem;
> }
>
> if (seg_fw->size != phdr->p_filesz) {
> dev_err(qproc->dev,
> "failed to load segment %d from truncated file %s\n",
> i, fw_name);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> release_firmware(seg_fw);
> - memunmap(ptr);
> - goto release_firmware;
> + goto e_inval_unmap;
> }
>
> release_firmware(seg_fw);
> @@ -1528,6 +1523,12 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_load(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> kfree(fw_name);
>
> return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> +
> +e_inval_unmap:
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> +unmap_mem:
> + memunmap(ptr);
> + goto release_firmware;
Ugh. No. ptr should be a variable that is declared inside the loop.
Calling memunmap outside of the for loop is incorrect. And goto just
complicates things by adding non-linearity.
> }
>
> static void qcom_q6v5_dump_segment(struct rproc *rproc,
> --
> 2.46.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry