Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] i2c: Add driver for the RTL9300 I2C controller

[Andi Shyti]

Hi Chris,

...

> +enum rtl9300_bus_freq {
> +	RTL9300_I2C_STD_FREQ,
> +	RTL9300_I2C_FAST_FREQ,
> +};
> +
> +struct rtl9300_i2c;
> +
> +struct rtl9300_i2c_chan {
> +	struct i2c_adapter adap;
> +	struct rtl9300_i2c *i2c;
> +	enum rtl9300_bus_freq bus_freq;
> +	u8 sda_pin;
> +};
> +
> +#define RTL9300_I2C_MUX_NCHAN	8
> +
> +struct rtl9300_i2c {
> +	struct regmap *regmap;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	struct rtl9300_i2c_chan chans[RTL9300_I2C_MUX_NCHAN];
> +	u32 reg_base;
> +	u8 sda_pin;
> +};

...

> +DEFINE_MUTEX(i2c_lock);

why is this lock defined here and not inside rtl9300_i2c?

...

> +static int rtl9300_i2c_execute_xfer(struct rtl9300_i2c *i2c, char read_write,
> +				int size, union i2c_smbus_data *data, int len)
> +{
> +	u32 val, mask;
> +	int ret;

...

> +static int rtl9300_i2c_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, u16 addr,
> +		  unsigned short flags, char read_write,
> +		  u8 command, int size, union i2c_smbus_data *data)

your alignments are a bit off.

A part from these two little notes, I don't see any issue here.

Thanks,
Andi

> +{
> +	struct rtl9300_i2c_chan *chan = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
> +	struct rtl9300_i2c *i2c = chan->i2c;
> +	int len = 0, ret;

...