[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.10 022/197] net: sched: consistently use rcu_replace_pointer() in taprio_change()

[Sasha Levin]

From: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit d5c4546062fd6f5dbce575c7ea52ad66d1968678 ]

According to Vinicius (and carefully looking through the whole
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b65e0af58423fc8a73aa
once again), txtime branch of 'taprio_change()' is not going to
race against 'advance_sched()'. But using 'rcu_replace_pointer()'
in the former may be a good idea as well.

Suggested-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
index b284a06b5a75f..847e1cc6052ec 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
@@ -1952,7 +1952,9 @@ static int taprio_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
 			goto unlock;
 		}
 
-		rcu_assign_pointer(q->admin_sched, new_admin);
+		/* Not going to race against advance_sched(), but still */
+		admin = rcu_replace_pointer(q->admin_sched, new_admin,
+					    lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
 		if (admin)
 			call_rcu(&admin->rcu, taprio_free_sched_cb);
 	} else {
-- 
2.43.0