Am Donnerstag, 26. September 2024, 09:49:18 CEST schrieb Dragan Simic:
Move the "l3_cache" node under the "cpus" node in the dtsi file for Rockchip
RK356x SoCs. There's no need for this cache node to be at the higher level.
Fixes: 8612169a05c5 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add cache information to the SoC dtsi for RK356x")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I think the commit message needs a bit more rationale on why this is a
stable-worthy fix. Because from the move and commit message it reads
like a styling choice ;-) .
I do agree that it makes more sense as child of cpus, but the commit
message should also elaborate on why that would matter for stable.
Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi
index 4690be841a1c..9f7136e5d553 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi
@@ -113,19 +113,19 @@ cpu3: cpu@300 {
d-cache-sets = <128>;
next-level-cache = <&l3_cache>;
};
- };
- /*
- * There are no private per-core L2 caches, but only the
- * L3 cache that appears to the CPU cores as L2 caches
- */
- l3_cache: l3-cache {
- compatible = "cache";
- cache-level = <2>;
- cache-unified;
- cache-size = <0x80000>;
- cache-line-size = <64>;
- cache-sets = <512>;
+ /*
+ * There are no private per-core L2 caches, but only the
+ * L3 cache that appears to the CPU cores as L2 caches
+ */
+ l3_cache: l3-cache {
+ compatible = "cache";
+ cache-level = <2>;
+ cache-unified;
+ cache-size = <0x80000>;
+ cache-line-size = <64>;
+ cache-sets = <512>;
+ };
};
cpu0_opp_table: opp-table-0 {
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip