Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: determine HS tHIGH and tLOW based on HW paramters

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 26/09/2024 14:18, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 08:45:47AM +0000, Michael Wu wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 12:16:10PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 04:04:30PM +0800, Michael Wu wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>>>> + * @bus_loading: for high speed mode, the bus loading affects the high
>>> and low
>>>>> + *	pulse width of SCL
>>>>
>>>> This is bad naming, better is bus_capacitance.
>>>
>>> Even more specific bus_capacitance_pf as we usually add physical units to the
>>> variable names, so we immediately understand from the code the order of
>>> numbers and their physical meanings. 
>>
>> Sounds good. However, I think the length of "bus_capacitance_pf" is a bit
>> long, we may often encounter the limit of more than 80 characters in a
>> line when coding. I'll rename it to "bus_cap_pf".
> 
> Limit had been relaxed to 100. I still think we may use temporary variables,

Just to be clear, because you encourage reformatting it to 100:

You mix coding style with checkpatch. Checkpatch does not define coding
style. Coding style doc defines it. Limit is 80, unless growing to 100
improves readability.

> if needed, in order to make code neater. That said, I slightly prefer
> bus_capacitance_pf over the shortened variant.
> 

Best regards,
Krzysztof