Re: [v4 3/9] platform/x86: asus-armoury: move existing tunings to asus-armoury module

[Markus Elfring]

>> How much would you like to care for standard compliance concerns
>> together with your software developments?
>
> I only ask about because it seems to deviate from everything else I've viewed. For example the older `asus-wmi.h` has:
>
> #ifndef _ASUS_WMI_H_
> #define _ASUS_WMI_H_

Such a naming approach is “popular”, isn't it?


> and every other header in the drivers/platform/x86 dir is similar. If what I'm supposed to is omit the leading `_` then sure I'll do it, it's not of any consequence to me.

I dare to propose possibilities to take safer identifier selections better into account.
I hope that we can benefit more from corresponding collateral evolution.

Regards,
Markus