Re: [PATCH v1] perf vdso: Missed put on 32-bit dsos

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 04:24:23PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 12:01:23PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 12:31 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 12:15 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > > <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 11:27:57AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > > > If the dso type doesn't match then NULL is returned but the dso should
> > > > > be put first.
> > > >
> > > > I guess we can add:
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: f649ed80f3cabbf1 ("perf dsos: Tidy reference counting and locking")
> > > >
> > > > ?
> > >
> > > Yep, that's the one that added the reference count increment.
> > 
> > Noticed this isn't in the tree yet, do I need to resend for the fixes tag?
> 
> Arnaldo, can you please pick this up to perf-tools?

Right, I just did that, b4 was nice enough to notice the Fixes tag I
suggested, its in my local branch, will push out soon.

- Arnaldo