Re: [PATCH 2/2] device: rust: change the name function
From: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon Sep 30 2024 - 07:36:47 EST
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 10:38:47AM -0300, Guilherme Giácomo Simões wrote:
> This function increments the refcount by this command
> "bindings::get_device(prt)"
> This can be confused because the function Arc::from_raw() from
> standard library, doesn't
> increment the refcount.
> Then, this function "Device::from_raw()" will be renamed for don't
> make confusion
> in the future.
Please wrap the lines here properly so they show up in a sane way :)
>
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme Giacomo Simoes <trintaeoitogc@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> rust/kernel/device.rs | 2 +-
> rust/kernel/firmware.rs | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/device.rs b/rust/kernel/device.rs
> index 851018eef885..ecffaff041e0 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/device.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/device.rs
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ impl Device {
> ///
> /// It must also be ensured that `bindings::device::release` can
> be called from any thread.
Your patch is line-wrapped and can not be applied :(
Please read the email documentation in the kernel for how to use gmail
to send patches out (hint, almost never do so, but you can use git
send-email through it), that will help you in sending changes that can
be applied.
> /// While not officially documented, this should be the case for
> any `struct device`.
> - pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: *mut bindings::device) -> ARef<Self> {
> + pub unsafe fn get_device(ptr: *mut bindings::device) -> ARef<Self> {
With this change, nothing broke? Does nothing call this code yet? I
thought the firmware interface did that, but I could be wrong...
thanks,
greg k-h