Re: [PATCH v2 14/16] media: platform: rzg2l-cru: rzg2l-csi2: Make use of rzg2l_csi2_formats array in rzg2l_csi2_enum_frame_size()

[Lad, Prabhakar]

Hi Laurent,

On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 1:52 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 01:19:25PM +0100, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > Hi Laurent,
> >
> > Thank you for the review.
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 12:11 AM Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Prabhakar,
> > >
> > > Thank you for the patch.
> > >
> > > I've just noticed that the subject line of most of your patches is much
> > > longer than the 72 characters limit. Please try to shorten them. You can
> > > replace the prefixes with "media: rzg2l-cru:", and reword the subject
> > > lines that mention long function names.
> > >
> > Ok, I'll rework the subject line so that it fits within 72 characters.
> >
> > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 06:53:55PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote:
> > > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Make use `rzg2l_csi2_formats` array in rzg2l_csi2_enum_frame_size().
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c | 5 ++++-
> > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c
> > > > index 79d99d865c1f..e630283dd1f1 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c
> > > > @@ -570,7 +570,10 @@ static int rzg2l_csi2_enum_frame_size(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > >                                     struct v4l2_subdev_state *sd_state,
> > > >                                     struct v4l2_subdev_frame_size_enum *fse)
> > > >  {
> > > > -     if (fse->index != 0)
> > > > +     if (fse->index >= ARRAY_SIZE(rzg2l_csi2_formats))
> > > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > Same comment as in 11/16. With this fixed,
> > >
> > Ok, I'll drop this check.
>
> Don't drop the check, drop the change. if (fse->index != 0) is the
> right check (testing > 0 works too).
>
Ahh sorry for not being clear, I meant I will drop the updated check.

Cheers,
Prabhakar