Re: [PATCH 21/35] ring-buffer: Reorganize kerneldoc parameter names

[Steven Rostedt]

On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:21:07 +0200
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Reorganize kerneldoc parameter names to match the parameter
> order in the function header.
> 
> Problems identified using Coccinelle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

-- Steve

> 
> ---
>  kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 77dc0b25140e..313dffbdeef1 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -2384,9 +2384,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__ring_buffer_alloc);
>   * __ring_buffer_alloc_range - allocate a new ring_buffer from existing memory
>   * @size: the size in bytes per cpu that is needed.
>   * @flags: attributes to set for the ring buffer.
> + * @order: sub-buffer order
>   * @start: start of allocated range
>   * @range_size: size of allocated range
> - * @order: sub-buffer order
>   * @key: ring buffer reader_lock_key.
>   *
>   * Currently the only flag that is available is the RB_FL_OVERWRITE