Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)

From: Davidlohr Bueso
Date: Mon Sep 30 2024 - 19:02:11 EST

Next message: Rosen Penev: "[PATCH] wifi: ath9k: return by of_get_mac_address"
Previous message: Nhat Pham: "Re: [PATCH v9 4/7] mm: Change count_objcg_event() to count_objcg_events() for batch event updates."
In reply to: Davidlohr Bueso: "Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 30 Sep 2024, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:\n

Also, the last sentence in the description would need to be dropped.

No never mind this, it is fine. I was mostly thinking about the pathological
unbounded scenario which is removed, but after re-reading the description
it is still valid.

Next message: Rosen Penev: "[PATCH] wifi: ath9k: return by of_get_mac_address"
Previous message: Nhat Pham: "Re: [PATCH v9 4/7] mm: Change count_objcg_event() to count_objcg_events() for batch event updates."
In reply to: Davidlohr Bueso: "Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]